What Are Some Pros and Cons to Capital Punishment?


by ITIF

Question by Samantha W: What are some pros and cons to Capital Punishment?
I need to know for my Political Science class. I have to write a report on both sides of the issue and I was hoping someone could help me out!

Best answer:

Answer by Lola Basenhoir
http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~tonya/spring/cap/group1.htm
http://prosandcons.us/?cat=61
http://www.richard.clark32.btinternet.co.uk/thoughts.html
http://www.hendersonchurchofchrist.org/articles/mike15.htm
http://www.albany.edu/~ab2166/

Passions in the US are sharply divided, and equally strong among both supporters and protesters of the death penalty.

Arguing against capital punishment, Amnesty International believes that “The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state in the name of justice. It violates the right to life…It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. There can never be any justification for torture or for cruel treatment.”

Arguing for capital punishment, the Clark County, Indiana Prosecuting Attorney writes that “…there are some defendants who have earned the ultimate punishment our society has to offer by committing murder with aggravating circumstances present. I believe life is sacred. It cheapens the life of an innocent murder victim to say that society has no right to keep the murderer from ever killing again. In my view, society has not only the right, but the duty to act in self defense to protect the innocent.”

And Catholic Cardinal McCarrick, Archbishop of Washington, writes “…the death penalty diminishes all of us, increases disrespect for human life, and offers the tragic illusion that we can teach that killing is wrong by killing.”
————————-

The death penalty has not always been practiced in the United States. The Depression era 1930s, which saw a historic peak in executions, was followed by a dramatic decrease in the 1950s and 1960s. No executions occurred in the US between 1967 to 1976.

In 1972, the Supreme Court effectively nullified the death penalty, and converted the death sentences of hundreds of death row inmates to life in prison. In 1976, another Supreme Court ruling found capital punishment to be Constitutional.

Latest News
Stanley “Tookie” Williams was put to death on December 13, 2005, by lethal injection by the state of California. The case of Mr. Williams, an author and Nobel Peace and Literature Prizes nominee, brought capital punishment back into prominent public discussion.
Mr. Williams was convicted of four murders committed in 1979, and sentenced to death. Williams professed innocence of these crimes. He was also co-founder of the Crips, a deadly and powerful Los Angeles-based street gang responsible for hundreds of murders.

About five years after incarceration, Mr. Williams underwent a religious conversion and, as a result, authored many books and programs to promote peace and to fight gangs and gang violence. He was nominated five times for the Nobel Peace Prize and four times for the Nobel Literature Prize.

Mr. Williams’ was a self-admitted life of crime and violence, followed by genuine redemption and a life of uniquely and unusually good works.

The circumstantial evidence against Williams left little doubt that he committed the four murders, despite last-minute claims by supporters. There also existed no doubt that Mr. Williams posed no further threat to society, and would contribute considerable good.

The case of Stanley Tookie Williams forced public reflection on the purpose of the death penalty:

— Is the purpose of the death penalty to remove from society someone who would cause more harm?

— Is the purpose to remove from society someone who is incapable of rehabilitation?

— Is the purpose of the death penalty to deter others from committing murder?

— Is the purpose of the death penalty to punish the criminal?

— Is the purpose of the death penalty to take retribution on behalf of the victim?

Background
The vast majority of democratic countries in Europe and Latin America have abolished capital punishment over the last fifty years, but United States, most democracies in Asia, and almost all totalitarian governments retain it.
Crimes that carry the death penalty vary greatly worldwide from treason and murder to theft. In militaries around the world, courts-martial have sentenced capital punishments also for cowardice, desertion, insubordination and mutiny.

According to Amnesty International’s annual report on official judicial executions, in 2004 there were 3,797 executions in 25 countries. More than 90 percent…about 3,400…took place in the People’s Republic of China. The remainder of the top four were Iran at 230, Vietnam at 64, and the United States at 59, followed by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Kuwait, Bangladesh, Singapore, Yemen and Egypt

Capital punishment in the US is now officially sanctioned by 36 states, as well as by the federal government. Each state with legalized capital punishment has different laws regarding its methods, age limits and crimes which qualify.

Since 1976, 1,004 felons have been executed in the US, distributed among the states as follows: Texas at 355 (35%), Virginia at 94, Oklahoma at 79, Missouri at 66, Florida at 60, Georgia at 39, North Carolina at 39, South Carolina at 35, Alabama at 34 , Arkansas at 27, Louisiana at 27 and 149 among 25 states.

States and US territories with no current death penalty statute are Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

Answer by sbma88
Pros: Families do not have to live with the idea that their loved one is dead while their murderer is alive, the prisoner does not have the chance to escape punishment

Cons: More expensive, morally questionable, prisoner does not have to live with their deed every day, prisoner might not be guilty

Give your answer to this question below!

 

State Senate Democrats propose alternative to Brown's prison plan
SACRAMENTO — Democratic leaders of the state Senate on Wednesday proposed an extra $ 200 million annually for rehabilitation, drug and mental health treatment as an alternative to Gov. Jerry Brown's plan for reducing prison crowding. Senate President …
Read more on Los Angeles Times

ASPCA: Rehabilitation of pit bulls rescued from dog fighting ring will take
Tim Rickey, vice president of field investigations and response for The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), said veterinarians have been working around the clock examining and providing treatment to the rescued dogs. Many …
Read more on The Birmingham News – al.com (blog)

New Assortment of Treatment Options Available Now at Alcohol Treatment
These less traditional rehabilitation treatments not only focus on getting sober, but on staying sober. Emphasis is now being placed on creating a solid support system for patients once they leave the center. Family counseling sessions are available …
Read more on DigitalJournal.com